.
Feedback

Wood Pond Road Home Sells for $318,000

South Windsor real estate sales for July 13 - 18

The following real estate transactions were recorded at South Windsor Town Hall between July 13 and 18:

July 18

Jessica L. Waterhouse-Van Wie and Donald R. Van Wie Jr. to Christopher J. Harhay for $235,000. Property located at 95 Greenfield Drive.

REO Asset Recovery LLC to James S. Vernadakis and Lyndee W. Wiggins for $263,000. Property located at 153 Northview Drive.


July 16

Marcia Banach to Allison Fierlit and David J. Peters for $145,000. Property located at 7 Ravine Road.

Louisa Yeung to Sangitaben D. Desai for $190,000. Property located at 32 Elderberry Lane.

Jodi Archambault to John Fritz for $153,500. Property located at 1020 Pleasant Valley Road.

July 13

Lynn M. and Craig A. Kochanski to Emily Marie and Adam Murphy for $195,000. Property located at 225 Lawrence Road.

Hannah G. Demallie to Christine and Alfredo Velasquez for $318,000. Property located at 29 Wood Pond Road.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from South Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Don't we deserve better?
Matt Riley May 22, 2013 at 07:49 pm
Sorry, "Steve" and "Susan" - I have to admit that I had the same thought thatRead More "Johnny" did. This is what happens when you are unwilling to publicly standup for what you believe in - for your ideas. Suggest you show up at a TC meeting and share your thoughts - just remember that you will have to state your name and address! "Johnny" - you need to come clean too - if you want to be taken seriously.
Susan May 22, 2013 at 03:41 pm
@Johnny, I don't know who you are but I know who I am and I am not Steve's wife. It appears howeverRead More we have the same philosophy. See what Mr. McCann does not understand that his arrogance will be his downfall. Why should someone identify themselves when his comment above sounds very threatening. Everyone who comes in contact with Mr. McCann better not disagree with him to his face as he will rip you apart. Proof of that is at council meetings. Good day Johnny.
Philip E. Koboski May 22, 2013 at 12:44 pm
I don't believe Kevin mentioned anything about anyone owing him anything in his post.
"Visionaries" of South Windsor lead by McCann and Daugherty hard at work...
Steve Phillips May 18, 2013 at 08:55 am
Mr. McCann arrogantly conducts himself on the Town Council and here as if he is above criticism,Read More forgetting (or simply not caring) about the privilege and responsibility serving elected office holds. A privilege and responsibility granted by the very same constituents McCann insults with comments above. Lacking empathy and humility are never traits respected leaders aspire, and sadly what McCann has disrespectfully expressed here.
Susan May 17, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Totally agree with you Mr. Sullivan. There are some who cannot use their real name or only a firstRead More name at fear of being attacked. Being a politician Mr. McCann has no problem speaking out. If you disagree with him you get ripped apart. I have witnessed it first hand by watching the council meetings on TV.
Michael Sullivan May 17, 2013 at 04:00 pm
Some folks choose not to use their real or full names on public bulletin boards and blogs…Read More Welcome to the 21st century Mr. McCann! Indeed the terms of use for Patch say quite clearly: "We encourage, but do not require, that the user name you provide be your real name." Mr. McCann you have chosen to be a public figure and politician. Others who may only wish to participate anonymously on blogs and postings such as these are not required to participate at whatever _you_ may deem to be an acceptable level.
Larry Torff May 17, 2013 at 10:29 pm
If tax, spend, borrow and figure out how to pay for it later is the way to budget for the future,Read More I'll take the old guard, thank you.
Michael Sullivan May 16, 2013 at 01:08 pm
I believe there's a misprint - the title should have been "BORROWING for the future"?
keith yagaloff May 14, 2013 at 06:07 pm
Darren, I've said many times that a small scale fields project could have been approved as early asRead More last summer. There are opportunities to fund the project from within the existing budget. Tom and I both offered to use money from the contingency account to get the planning studies completed. The hockey rink proponents never brought any actual data to the council. The town manager and our financial consultant gathered financial data and notified the council that the project was not viable. A political fight over funding the pension using 7.75% versus 8% as the discount rate was unnecessary. The pension was funded in accordance with the ARC, as town councils have done virtually every year since the pension was in place. Fluctuations due to market conditions far exceed the differences in proposed funding. We have had positive town audits with no indication that the town's financial rating is at risk. The town is financially very healthy.
Darren DeMartino May 14, 2013 at 05:13 pm
Keith I think Buford makes a lot of sense. The large majority of this tax increase was caused by theRead More past council members for years more worried about getting reelected than the current council. This increase was fueled by years of cutting to the bone, pushing things off when they should have been dealt with in a timely fashion. Mayor Delnicki (not Delnickie) who you have praised so much over the past day or so himself warned numerous times that this increase was coming. He stated numerous times on camera and in the press that there would be a day of reckoning in the future due to the cuts we had made over the years and now that it is here no one wants to face it. Now that you and Tom are on the same side it is interesting how much your perspective has changed? It is interesting in your article that you reference how certain councilors have embrace the borrow and spend mentality yet you and your cohorts voted against amendments to fund the pension based upon a more realistic 7.75% discount rate in comparison to 8% as well as an amendment that would have prevented us from taking $800,000 out of found account(savings account) which could negatively impact our future ratings. In regards to the fields you have stated you are in favor of them so if so why not take advantage of low construction costs and historically low interest rates to invest in something that will make our town a more desirable place to live? In regards to the hockey rink why is it that we never even got the facts about what the financial impact would be to the town. We both know it was because somehow egos got in the way of exploring what would be best for our town. Our town is a great place to live but if we continue down this past that wont be the case in a very short time.
keith yagaloff May 14, 2013 at 03:22 pm
Dear Buford, thank you for your comments. You more than adequately describe your views when youRead More write "Unfortunately for you, you live in a 1%er town in a 1%er state." All that my wife and I possess was earned through honest hard work and we take no shame in that. Never once, however, did it cross my mind to use taxpayer money to fund projects for myself and my friends. I feel sorry for other hard working people living in South Windsor who find their tax dollars have been co-opted by elected officials who think they are running Apple or Walmart.