.
Feedback

Malloy Says Hurricane Sandy Could be a '36-Hour Storm'

The governor today said the state is preparing for a moderate to worst-case scenario and the hurricane's effects will last much longer than what most people are used to from such storms.

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy is confident that state emergency management officials and Connecticut utility providers are doing all they can to prepare for Hurricane Sandy the affects of which are expected to hit the state as early as Sunday night.

During a press conference Friday afternoon on the state’s preparedness for the hurricane Malloy also underscored the importance of the public’s readiness for the storm and said residents should understand that Sandy, depending on where the hurricane makes landfall, could bring heavy rain and winds for a sustained period.

“We’re talking about a (storm) delivery timeframe of substantially longer than perhaps what people are used to,” Malloy told a gathering of reporters outside his offices at the state capitol. “This is not a 12-hour storm. This could be a 36-hour storm with 40-plus mile an hour winds.” Residents should also plan for a minimum of seven inches of rain, he said.

The storm’s anticipated long duration means residents who do lose power could be out for a long time because officials won’t endanger work crews by sending them out into the storm, he added.

“That’s why it’s important that people understand the timeframe of this storm.”

Malloy met with reporters after he held a noontime briefing with about two dozen representatives of utility companies, including CL&P, United Illuminating and AT&T, as well as members of his Department of Emergency Services & Public Protection. He said all of the officials have assured him that they are doing everything they can to prepare for the storm. He also said he believes utility companies are also much better prepared for this storm than they were for Hurricane Irene in August of 2011 and the October snowstorm that followed.

Those storms devastated many areas of the state and each cut power to more than 700,000 homes and businesses. CL&P came under harsh criticism, from all quarters of the private and public sector, following both storms for its poor planning before, during and after the storms that left some in the dark for up to 10 days.

Malloy said he is partially activating the state’s Emergency Operations Center at the State Armory in Hartford on Saturday morning and will hold additional briefings there this weekend. He said he has not activated the Connecticut National Guard but has put its leaders on notice that he may call upon it.

Bill Quinlan, CL&P Senior Vice President of Emergency Preparedness, reiterated that the company learned from the mistakes of last year’s storms and is hiring an additional 2,000 linemen and tree contractors from the Midwest. He said he expects those workers to be in the state by Sunday, ready for the storm’s aftermath. The crews will be stationed in four regional staging areas around the state, including ones in Bristol, Fairfield and at the Waterford Speedbowl.

Officials from United Illuminating, which provides electricity to towns in southwestern and western Connecticut, said they are hiring additional linemen and tree workers and are bringing in a total of 600 additional workers who will help assess damage, repair lines and remove trees.

Quinlan, Malloy and UI officials also said they are holding regular conference calls with municipal officials to keep them abreast of the hurricane response plans. Quinlan said that since last year, CL&P has undertaken a massive overhaul of its technology and communication systems and are now focused on three key issues when a storm of this magnitude hits: Keeping tabs of where work crews are, what they are working on and when they will complete that work and restore power.

After Hurricane Irene municipal officials blasted CL&P for poor communication with town leaders and failure to properly deploy their work crews.

Officials with AT&T, one of the state’s largest cell phone providers, said they have installed new generators at cell towers around the state and have beefed up backup batteries there. Malloy said the company also is bringing in some 1,000 telephone poles to prepare in advance for ones that might be damaged by Irene’s winds. If power goes out, he said residents should text on their cell phones instead of making calls because texting places less demand on cell transmissions.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from South Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Don't we deserve better?
Susan May 23, 2013 at 06:42 am
Mr. Riley your arrogance will be your downfall as well. You elitists do not get it. Jobs may haveRead More been created in the state but folks are still losing their homes.
Matt Riley May 22, 2013 at 07:49 pm
Sorry, "Steve" and "Susan" - I have to admit that I had the same thought thatRead More "Johnny" did. This is what happens when you are unwilling to publicly standup for what you believe in - for your ideas. Suggest you show up at a TC meeting and share your thoughts - just remember that you will have to state your name and address! "Johnny" - you need to come clean too - if you want to be taken seriously.
Susan May 22, 2013 at 03:41 pm
@Johnny, I don't know who you are but I know who I am and I am not Steve's wife. It appears howeverRead More we have the same philosophy. See what Mr. McCann does not understand that his arrogance will be his downfall. Why should someone identify themselves when his comment above sounds very threatening. Everyone who comes in contact with Mr. McCann better not disagree with him to his face as he will rip you apart. Proof of that is at council meetings. Good day Johnny.
"Visionaries" of South Windsor lead by McCann and Daugherty hard at work...
Steve Phillips May 18, 2013 at 08:55 am
Mr. McCann arrogantly conducts himself on the Town Council and here as if he is above criticism,Read More forgetting (or simply not caring) about the privilege and responsibility serving elected office holds. A privilege and responsibility granted by the very same constituents McCann insults with comments above. Lacking empathy and humility are never traits respected leaders aspire, and sadly what McCann has disrespectfully expressed here.
Susan May 17, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Totally agree with you Mr. Sullivan. There are some who cannot use their real name or only a firstRead More name at fear of being attacked. Being a politician Mr. McCann has no problem speaking out. If you disagree with him you get ripped apart. I have witnessed it first hand by watching the council meetings on TV.
Michael Sullivan May 17, 2013 at 04:00 pm
Some folks choose not to use their real or full names on public bulletin boards and blogs…Read More Welcome to the 21st century Mr. McCann! Indeed the terms of use for Patch say quite clearly: "We encourage, but do not require, that the user name you provide be your real name." Mr. McCann you have chosen to be a public figure and politician. Others who may only wish to participate anonymously on blogs and postings such as these are not required to participate at whatever _you_ may deem to be an acceptable level.
Larry Torff May 17, 2013 at 10:29 pm
If tax, spend, borrow and figure out how to pay for it later is the way to budget for the future,Read More I'll take the old guard, thank you.
Michael Sullivan May 16, 2013 at 01:08 pm
I believe there's a misprint - the title should have been "BORROWING for the future"?
keith yagaloff May 14, 2013 at 06:07 pm
Darren, I've said many times that a small scale fields project could have been approved as early asRead More last summer. There are opportunities to fund the project from within the existing budget. Tom and I both offered to use money from the contingency account to get the planning studies completed. The hockey rink proponents never brought any actual data to the council. The town manager and our financial consultant gathered financial data and notified the council that the project was not viable. A political fight over funding the pension using 7.75% versus 8% as the discount rate was unnecessary. The pension was funded in accordance with the ARC, as town councils have done virtually every year since the pension was in place. Fluctuations due to market conditions far exceed the differences in proposed funding. We have had positive town audits with no indication that the town's financial rating is at risk. The town is financially very healthy.
Darren DeMartino May 14, 2013 at 05:13 pm
Keith I think Buford makes a lot of sense. The large majority of this tax increase was caused by theRead More past council members for years more worried about getting reelected than the current council. This increase was fueled by years of cutting to the bone, pushing things off when they should have been dealt with in a timely fashion. Mayor Delnicki (not Delnickie) who you have praised so much over the past day or so himself warned numerous times that this increase was coming. He stated numerous times on camera and in the press that there would be a day of reckoning in the future due to the cuts we had made over the years and now that it is here no one wants to face it. Now that you and Tom are on the same side it is interesting how much your perspective has changed? It is interesting in your article that you reference how certain councilors have embrace the borrow and spend mentality yet you and your cohorts voted against amendments to fund the pension based upon a more realistic 7.75% discount rate in comparison to 8% as well as an amendment that would have prevented us from taking $800,000 out of found account(savings account) which could negatively impact our future ratings. In regards to the fields you have stated you are in favor of them so if so why not take advantage of low construction costs and historically low interest rates to invest in something that will make our town a more desirable place to live? In regards to the hockey rink why is it that we never even got the facts about what the financial impact would be to the town. We both know it was because somehow egos got in the way of exploring what would be best for our town. Our town is a great place to live but if we continue down this past that wont be the case in a very short time.
keith yagaloff May 14, 2013 at 03:22 pm
Dear Buford, thank you for your comments. You more than adequately describe your views when youRead More write "Unfortunately for you, you live in a 1%er town in a 1%er state." All that my wife and I possess was earned through honest hard work and we take no shame in that. Never once, however, did it cross my mind to use taxpayer money to fund projects for myself and my friends. I feel sorry for other hard working people living in South Windsor who find their tax dollars have been co-opted by elected officials who think they are running Apple or Walmart.