.
Feedback

The State of the Valentine's Day Candy Union

The candy ninja strikes again.

As (I hope) you all know, President Barack Obama delivered his State of the Union address on Tuesday.

I, naturally, didn’t watch it. Though I was following my Twitter feed and evidently all that happened was Marco Rubio got a little thirsty during the speech.

Anyhoo, I think that this is the perfect opportunity to give a State of the Candy (Valentine's edition) address to all three of my readers. (I’d name who you are, but I don’t want to embarrass you.)


I want to thank Vernon Local Editor Chris Dehnel for the idea. Poor Chris is allergic to chocolate (no lie, evidently he blows up like a strawberry when he comes even remotely in contact with the stuff), so if you see a mustached man holding his nose while picking out a V-Day present, assume it’s the contents of the package and not how he feels about his wife.

Here are some quick missives about the state of candy around this manufactured day of love:

1. There are WAY more choices for Valentines than when I was a kid. I now have two stepchildren below the age of 10. The things they can now get their classmates are incredible. Prepackaged Blow-Pop Valentines, Star Wars Valentines (I am sure that Amy, the girl who I had a crush on in second grade, would be Mrs. Ted Glanzer if she ever got a Yoda Valentine from yours truly. What better way to say “I love you” than with a 2.5-foot tall, light-saber wielding, hairy-eared green man from the planet Degobah? Actually, Yoda would say, “Love you, I do. Yes.”), Spongebob Valentines. Man, the kids today have it easy.

In my day, you got lame Valentines that you filled out as quickly as possible so as to not ruin your dude-cred. Man, I hated giving those stinky girls Valentines.

I learned the hard way that the egalitarian method of Valentine’s Day (everyone gets a card! Even the stinky girls!) in elementary school was much less stressful than the Darwinian method of Valentine’s Day — only good looking, popular guys get Valentines from those not-so-stinky, kinda nice looking girls — in middle and high school.

Sigh.

2. There are TOO many choices available for Valentine’s Day candy. I can’t believe I’m saying this, but I recently went into the Wal-Mart, and I walked straight into an aisle that can best be described as a red wall of doom. My eyes exploded from all the options: heart-shaped Butterfingers, heart-shaped Sweetarts, heart-shaped hearts. No lie, there was a Valentine-themed section for Nerds. Fellas, if you’re getting Nerds for your sweetheart, she ain’t sticking around long. She’s gonna leave you for some guy who has a Nestle’s Crunch or a Snickers up his sleeve.

Actually, if you are over the age of 20 and shopping for Valentine’s Day candy at Wal-Mart, you may have some problems. Get yourself a nice box of Munsons or Godiva and put a smile on her face.

Then wipe that smile right off by eating the entire box yourself. Not that I have ever done that.

3. Conversation hearts need to be more realistic. Seriously, what’s with the “Be mine” and “Text Me” and “Crazy 4 U?” What dudes want to see on their conversation hearts (though not me. I love you, honey! … honey?) is something like the following: “You don’t watch enough sports” “I want you to spend more time with your friends” “I won’t mind if you go to Vegas for the weekend.”

4. Putting out Easter candy at the same time that Valentine’s candy on major display is an abomination (see the photo in the gallery above). Pretty sure it’s in the Bible.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from South Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Don't we deserve better?
Philip E. Koboski May 22, 2013 at 12:44 pm
I don't believe Kevin mentioned anything about anyone owing him anything in his post.
Johnny May 22, 2013 at 12:38 pm
Steve, it's nice that your wife Susan comments on all of your posts.
Steve Phillips May 22, 2013 at 10:33 am
Mr. McCann, you forget, we don't owe you anything. Not. A. Single. Thing. Your dismissive,Read More arrogant attitude is exactly the problem that only an election can cure.
"Visionaries" of South Windsor lead by McCann and Daugherty hard at work...
Steve Phillips May 18, 2013 at 08:55 am
Mr. McCann arrogantly conducts himself on the Town Council and here as if he is above criticism,Read More forgetting (or simply not caring) about the privilege and responsibility serving elected office holds. A privilege and responsibility granted by the very same constituents McCann insults with comments above. Lacking empathy and humility are never traits respected leaders aspire, and sadly what McCann has disrespectfully expressed here.
Susan May 17, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Totally agree with you Mr. Sullivan. There are some who cannot use their real name or only a firstRead More name at fear of being attacked. Being a politician Mr. McCann has no problem speaking out. If you disagree with him you get ripped apart. I have witnessed it first hand by watching the council meetings on TV.
Michael Sullivan May 17, 2013 at 04:00 pm
Some folks choose not to use their real or full names on public bulletin boards and blogs…Read More Welcome to the 21st century Mr. McCann! Indeed the terms of use for Patch say quite clearly: "We encourage, but do not require, that the user name you provide be your real name." Mr. McCann you have chosen to be a public figure and politician. Others who may only wish to participate anonymously on blogs and postings such as these are not required to participate at whatever _you_ may deem to be an acceptable level.
Larry Torff May 17, 2013 at 10:29 pm
If tax, spend, borrow and figure out how to pay for it later is the way to budget for the future,Read More I'll take the old guard, thank you.
Michael Sullivan May 16, 2013 at 01:08 pm
I believe there's a misprint - the title should have been "BORROWING for the future"?
keith yagaloff May 14, 2013 at 06:07 pm
Darren, I've said many times that a small scale fields project could have been approved as early asRead More last summer. There are opportunities to fund the project from within the existing budget. Tom and I both offered to use money from the contingency account to get the planning studies completed. The hockey rink proponents never brought any actual data to the council. The town manager and our financial consultant gathered financial data and notified the council that the project was not viable. A political fight over funding the pension using 7.75% versus 8% as the discount rate was unnecessary. The pension was funded in accordance with the ARC, as town councils have done virtually every year since the pension was in place. Fluctuations due to market conditions far exceed the differences in proposed funding. We have had positive town audits with no indication that the town's financial rating is at risk. The town is financially very healthy.
Darren DeMartino May 14, 2013 at 05:13 pm
Keith I think Buford makes a lot of sense. The large majority of this tax increase was caused by theRead More past council members for years more worried about getting reelected than the current council. This increase was fueled by years of cutting to the bone, pushing things off when they should have been dealt with in a timely fashion. Mayor Delnicki (not Delnickie) who you have praised so much over the past day or so himself warned numerous times that this increase was coming. He stated numerous times on camera and in the press that there would be a day of reckoning in the future due to the cuts we had made over the years and now that it is here no one wants to face it. Now that you and Tom are on the same side it is interesting how much your perspective has changed? It is interesting in your article that you reference how certain councilors have embrace the borrow and spend mentality yet you and your cohorts voted against amendments to fund the pension based upon a more realistic 7.75% discount rate in comparison to 8% as well as an amendment that would have prevented us from taking $800,000 out of found account(savings account) which could negatively impact our future ratings. In regards to the fields you have stated you are in favor of them so if so why not take advantage of low construction costs and historically low interest rates to invest in something that will make our town a more desirable place to live? In regards to the hockey rink why is it that we never even got the facts about what the financial impact would be to the town. We both know it was because somehow egos got in the way of exploring what would be best for our town. Our town is a great place to live but if we continue down this past that wont be the case in a very short time.
keith yagaloff May 14, 2013 at 03:22 pm
Dear Buford, thank you for your comments. You more than adequately describe your views when youRead More write "Unfortunately for you, you live in a 1%er town in a 1%er state." All that my wife and I possess was earned through honest hard work and we take no shame in that. Never once, however, did it cross my mind to use taxpayer money to fund projects for myself and my friends. I feel sorry for other hard working people living in South Windsor who find their tax dollars have been co-opted by elected officials who think they are running Apple or Walmart.