.
Feedback

Warrant: DNA Links Glastonbury Doctor to Sex-For-Drugs Charges

Prosecutors will attempt to use DNA evidence to prove that Dr. Tory J. Westbrook traded sex for prescription narcotics, according to a warrant unsealed Tuesday.

Prosecutors will use DNA evidence in their case against Dr. Tory J. Westbrook in an attempt to prove that he traded sex for prescription narcotics during encounters with a patient at his Clinton office, according to new court documents released Wednesday.

Westbrook appeared in Middletown Superior Court Tuesday, where the latest warrant was released during a brief hearing before Judge David Gold. Westbrook’s lawyers filed a motion before Tuesday’s court appearance requesting to publicly identify the latest accuser, an as-yet-unnamed 42-year-old woman, according to court officials.

The lawyers argue that since the latest allegations deal with drug crimes, the woman does not gain the same protections against public disclosure as sexual assault victims. Gold agreed to hear arguments on the motion when Westbrook returns to court on Oct. 11.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

The woman said that she had sex with Westbrook at his office at the Community Health Center in Clinton for approximately a year, beginning in the spring of 2011. She estimated that she and the married Westbrook had sex approximately 20 times in that manner, according to the affidavit.

The woman told police that Westbrook scheduled appointments every two to three weeks after their first sexual encounter. During the appointments Westbrook exchanged sex for Oxycodone prescriptions, the woman said.

According to the warrant, the woman first went to the health center for head pain, for which Westbrook prescribed Oxycodone. She told police that she “soon became addicted,” the warrant said.

The woman brought police seven used condoms that she claimed were used during sex with Westbrook; the DNA taken from the condoms was consistent with a sample taken from Westbrook in June. The woman told police she saved the condoms because she “knew what Dr. Westbrook was doing to her was wrong and she wanted proof,” the warrant said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from South Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin McCann:  Don't we deserve better?
Hank Cullinane May 23, 2013 at 04:09 pm
entrenched politician, Nixonian strategy, Petulant bait and switch, profligate spending, OrwellianRead More "new approach", but don't worry Kevin it is just a perceived persecutor.
Kevin McCann May 23, 2013 at 03:17 pm
Mike, thanks for using your real name, and for trying to have a repsectful discourse. I wish moreRead More would do so. I disagree with you, but we can agree to disagree. I do not berate people's ideas, and I have never threatened anyone. My only criticism has been of the tactic of taking pot shots from the dark. I believe that "Steve Phillips" is an elected official, which makes his rants that much more objectionable by using a pseudonym. I don't mind criticism. What I do mind is shadowy mud slinging that makes it so difficult for either party to recruit good people to run for office. There are a lot of good people who see the gratuitous insults and maligning, and say that they do not want to subject themselves to that nonsense. Using real names raises the level of discourse and allows for a real exchange of ideas.
Michael Sullivan May 23, 2013 at 01:01 pm
More red-herring here! First Mr. McCann and now Mr. Riley... Really, gentlemen? You do yourselvesRead More a disservice. How can you expect to be taken seriously as town leaders if you would continue to persist in berating folks on public blogs about their user names?!? It is undignified. Quite plainly you are bullying here – I question your judgment.
"Visionaries" of South Windsor lead by McCann and Daugherty hard at work...
Steve Phillips May 18, 2013 at 08:55 am
Mr. McCann arrogantly conducts himself on the Town Council and here as if he is above criticism,Read More forgetting (or simply not caring) about the privilege and responsibility serving elected office holds. A privilege and responsibility granted by the very same constituents McCann insults with comments above. Lacking empathy and humility are never traits respected leaders aspire, and sadly what McCann has disrespectfully expressed here.
Susan May 17, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Totally agree with you Mr. Sullivan. There are some who cannot use their real name or only a firstRead More name at fear of being attacked. Being a politician Mr. McCann has no problem speaking out. If you disagree with him you get ripped apart. I have witnessed it first hand by watching the council meetings on TV.
Michael Sullivan May 17, 2013 at 04:00 pm
Some folks choose not to use their real or full names on public bulletin boards and blogs…Read More Welcome to the 21st century Mr. McCann! Indeed the terms of use for Patch say quite clearly: "We encourage, but do not require, that the user name you provide be your real name." Mr. McCann you have chosen to be a public figure and politician. Others who may only wish to participate anonymously on blogs and postings such as these are not required to participate at whatever _you_ may deem to be an acceptable level.