.
Feedback

Council Passes Hotel Tax Abatement, but Project 'Potentially' in Jeopardy

Last-minute change to proposed abatement for hotel to be constructed in South Windsor leads company executive to further discuss plan.

The Town Council on Monday unanimously approved three tax abatements for businesses that are expected to open in South Windsor over the course of the next few years.

But even though they were approved, one abatement - for a hotel to be constructed at The Promenade Shops at Evergreen Walk - may have actually jeopardized whether the project moves forward.


Ohio-based Radius Hospitality approached the council in mid-September with a request for a 7-year, 100 percent tax abatement to construct a $12 million Cambria Suites Hotel.

Members of the council at the time balked at the request, stating that the council had never provided such a generous tax abatement.

At the meeting on Monday, the original motion brought forth by Councilor Dr. Saud Anwar sought an abatement with the following terms: a 100 percent abatement for the first three years, followed by an 80 percent abatement in year four, 70 percent in year five, 60 percent in year six and 50 percent in year seven.

The total estimated tax benefit of the 100 percent abatement request for Radius Hospitality, according to Town Manager Matthew Galligan, would have been about $1.04 million over the course of the seven years.

But under Anwar’s original motion, the town would have realized a gain of about $800,000 in building permit fees and taxes that Radius Hospitality would have paid the town, Galligan said.

Deputy Mayor Gary Bazzano moved to amend Anwar’s motion - which the council ultimately approved in a 5-4 vote - to have years two and three changed from a 100 percent abatement to 80 percent. The other years remained unchanged.

Town Councilor Ed Havens opposed the amendment, saying that while the requested abatement was favorable to the developer, the tough economic times called for the unusual arrangement.

After the amendment, the council approved the abatement unanimously.

According to Galligan, the additional revenue the town will realize in taxes is about $72,000 over the course of years two and three as a result of the amended motion.

That is if the hotel is constructed.

“Potentially,” was how Radius Hospitality President Scott Yaeger responded to the question as to whether the council’s changing the abatement jeopardized the project. “We’ll have to talk about it internally.”

The hotel project is expected to give a shot in the arm to the local economy by employing some 50 to 70 trade workers for the construction as well as 30 to 40 employees to staff it once it is opened.

In addition, the hotel is a key component to The Promenade Shops at Evergreen Walk development plan, which is also looking to have an apartment complex built nearby. The idea is to build the hotel and the apartments simultaneously to take advantage of the economies of scale, according to Galligan.

One humorous portion of an otherwise serious discussion came from Councilor Cary Prague, who noticed that the hotel had a pool.

"If you put in an air hockey table and an arcade..." Prague said before trailing off. Prague was alluding to an earlier discussion about a proposed rink/recreation complex/pool construction project also at Evergreen Walk that the town is looking into. The $10.5 million project has been a subject of intense debate among residents and Councilors for the better part of a month.

Two other abatements pass

The other two abatements approved by the council - one for American Eagle Credit Union, the other for LCB Senior Living LLC - were far less controversial.

LCB Senior Living, LLC will receive a 50 percent tax abatement for five years, for a total tax revenue benefit of $627,300.

The credit union will receive a three-year, 50 percent tax abatement for a total benefit of about $52,000.

Both of those abatements were in line with similar arrangements that were recently passed in the last year or two for a bank and a senior living facility.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from South Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin McCann:  Don't we deserve better?
Hank Cullinane May 23, 2013 at 04:09 pm
entrenched politician, Nixonian strategy, Petulant bait and switch, profligate spending, OrwellianRead More "new approach", but don't worry Kevin it is just a perceived persecutor.
Kevin McCann May 23, 2013 at 03:17 pm
Mike, thanks for using your real name, and for trying to have a repsectful discourse. I wish moreRead More would do so. I disagree with you, but we can agree to disagree. I do not berate people's ideas, and I have never threatened anyone. My only criticism has been of the tactic of taking pot shots from the dark. I believe that "Steve Phillips" is an elected official, which makes his rants that much more objectionable by using a pseudonym. I don't mind criticism. What I do mind is shadowy mud slinging that makes it so difficult for either party to recruit good people to run for office. There are a lot of good people who see the gratuitous insults and maligning, and say that they do not want to subject themselves to that nonsense. Using real names raises the level of discourse and allows for a real exchange of ideas.
Michael Sullivan May 23, 2013 at 01:01 pm
More red-herring here! First Mr. McCann and now Mr. Riley... Really, gentlemen? You do yourselvesRead More a disservice. How can you expect to be taken seriously as town leaders if you would continue to persist in berating folks on public blogs about their user names?!? It is undignified. Quite plainly you are bullying here – I question your judgment.
"Visionaries" of South Windsor lead by McCann and Daugherty hard at work...
Steve Phillips May 18, 2013 at 08:55 am
Mr. McCann arrogantly conducts himself on the Town Council and here as if he is above criticism,Read More forgetting (or simply not caring) about the privilege and responsibility serving elected office holds. A privilege and responsibility granted by the very same constituents McCann insults with comments above. Lacking empathy and humility are never traits respected leaders aspire, and sadly what McCann has disrespectfully expressed here.
Susan May 17, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Totally agree with you Mr. Sullivan. There are some who cannot use their real name or only a firstRead More name at fear of being attacked. Being a politician Mr. McCann has no problem speaking out. If you disagree with him you get ripped apart. I have witnessed it first hand by watching the council meetings on TV.
Michael Sullivan May 17, 2013 at 04:00 pm
Some folks choose not to use their real or full names on public bulletin boards and blogs…Read More Welcome to the 21st century Mr. McCann! Indeed the terms of use for Patch say quite clearly: "We encourage, but do not require, that the user name you provide be your real name." Mr. McCann you have chosen to be a public figure and politician. Others who may only wish to participate anonymously on blogs and postings such as these are not required to participate at whatever _you_ may deem to be an acceptable level.