.
Feedback

Councilor Seeks to Ban Cigarette Sales in South Windsor Pharmacies

Dr. Saud Anwar argues that a business that deals in health care sends out a mixed message by selling cigarettes.

A town councilor is seeking to prohibit town pharmacies from selling tobacco-related products in their establishments.

Councilor Dr. Anwar Saud most recently brought up the proposal at the Town Council meeting on Monday, stating that he was seeking an ordinance prohibiting, among other things, the sale of cigarettes or, at the very least, a resolution from the council that set forth the town’s position against such sales.


The rationale behind the push, according to Saud, is that pharmacies are now opening front-line medical clinics, and the sale of cigarettes at such establishments sent out mixed messages. Saud specifically mentioned CVS, which opened a MinuteClinic within its South Windsor store. CVS also sells cigarettes, which are offered behind the front counter.

“My hope is to restrict pharmacies from selling tobacco-based products because they put the health of patients in jeopardy,” Saud said in a telephone interview. “It’s also about the sanctity of facilities that deal with people’s health.”

While several councilors on Monday said that they were vehemently opposed to smoking (Councilor Cary Prague said that he won’t buy products for his business from a vendor who smells of smoke), Mayor Tom Delnicki said that he was concerned about passing a measure that could lead down “a slippery slope.”

“First it's cigarettes, then it’s Slurpees, then it’s Big Gulps,” Delnicki said referring to two popular products that are offered by the convenience-store chain 7-Eleven.

But Anwar on Tuesday drew a distinction between products sold at pharmacies such as candy bars and sodas, things that, if consumed to excess, can lead to health problems, and tobacco-related products like cigarettes.

“Cigarettes are unhealthy for people consuming them and also for people around them,” Anwar said, referring to second-hand smoke. “Also, hardly any hospital allows people to consume cigarettes within its own facility. We have evolved as a society where we are trying to protect the community from harming itself or others in the process. …

“It’s a good idea to put a value on people above profit.”

After a brief discussion on Monday, it was decided that the matter would be referred to the town attorney to research whether it was lawful for the town to pass an ordinance that essentially targets one or two pharmacies, while leaving out other businesses such as convenience stores.

South Windsor isn't the only municipality that is examining ways of controlling within its borders the sale or possession of products that can be harmful to residents.

According to a published report by MassLive.com, 25 communities have banned the sale of tobacco products from pharmacies and supermarkets that have pharmacies. Springfield passed such a measure in May.

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg recently proposed a controversial ban on the sale of sugary beverages over 16 ounces in restaurants, stadiums and movie theaters.

In 2008, the Supreme Court struck down a Washington D.C. measure that banned the ownership of handguns within the city.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from South Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin McCann:  Don't we deserve better?
Hank Cullinane May 23, 2013 at 04:09 pm
entrenched politician, Nixonian strategy, Petulant bait and switch, profligate spending, OrwellianRead More "new approach", but don't worry Kevin it is just a perceived persecutor.
Kevin McCann May 23, 2013 at 03:17 pm
Mike, thanks for using your real name, and for trying to have a repsectful discourse. I wish moreRead More would do so. I disagree with you, but we can agree to disagree. I do not berate people's ideas, and I have never threatened anyone. My only criticism has been of the tactic of taking pot shots from the dark. I believe that "Steve Phillips" is an elected official, which makes his rants that much more objectionable by using a pseudonym. I don't mind criticism. What I do mind is shadowy mud slinging that makes it so difficult for either party to recruit good people to run for office. There are a lot of good people who see the gratuitous insults and maligning, and say that they do not want to subject themselves to that nonsense. Using real names raises the level of discourse and allows for a real exchange of ideas.
Michael Sullivan May 23, 2013 at 01:01 pm
More red-herring here! First Mr. McCann and now Mr. Riley... Really, gentlemen? You do yourselvesRead More a disservice. How can you expect to be taken seriously as town leaders if you would continue to persist in berating folks on public blogs about their user names?!? It is undignified. Quite plainly you are bullying here – I question your judgment.
"Visionaries" of South Windsor lead by McCann and Daugherty hard at work...
Steve Phillips May 18, 2013 at 08:55 am
Mr. McCann arrogantly conducts himself on the Town Council and here as if he is above criticism,Read More forgetting (or simply not caring) about the privilege and responsibility serving elected office holds. A privilege and responsibility granted by the very same constituents McCann insults with comments above. Lacking empathy and humility are never traits respected leaders aspire, and sadly what McCann has disrespectfully expressed here.
Susan May 17, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Totally agree with you Mr. Sullivan. There are some who cannot use their real name or only a firstRead More name at fear of being attacked. Being a politician Mr. McCann has no problem speaking out. If you disagree with him you get ripped apart. I have witnessed it first hand by watching the council meetings on TV.
Michael Sullivan May 17, 2013 at 04:00 pm
Some folks choose not to use their real or full names on public bulletin boards and blogs…Read More Welcome to the 21st century Mr. McCann! Indeed the terms of use for Patch say quite clearly: "We encourage, but do not require, that the user name you provide be your real name." Mr. McCann you have chosen to be a public figure and politician. Others who may only wish to participate anonymously on blogs and postings such as these are not required to participate at whatever _you_ may deem to be an acceptable level.