.
Feedback

Mayor Asks for 'Request For Proposal' for Ambulance Services

The Town Council wants Advances Life Services to be available in South Windsor.

With the town’s population growing and resident needs evolving, it is time to seriously consider ways to make advance life support services available in town, according to council members.

For this reason, Mayor Thomas A. Delnicki, at the behest of the council, has directed the town manager and town attorney to draft a request to solicit proposals for ways to provide such services in South Windsor.

"It's about time that the town offers paramedic service," Councilor Keith Yagaloff said.

Currently, the South Windsor Ambulance Corps, the town’s primary ambulance provider, offers EMT, or basic life support services, but a Manchester ambulance company must be called in if a paramedic, or additional advanced life support services, is required. 

As a result, possibly up to 40 percent of patients are double billed - one for the South Windsor Ambulance Corps’ transportation costs and then for the Advanced Life Services (ALS) costs from the Manchester ambulance.

"They've served our town well, but the times have changed ... it's time to evolve," Councilor Saud Anwar said during a meeting Monday night, referring to the increasing number of seniors in South Windsor.

Councilor Edward Havens was quick to defend the ambulance corps’ long history of serving the town of South Windsor. 

"It appears to me that it is us against them," Havens said, adding that in order to maintain fairness “they should be become part of this conversation."

"We have asked them to come in," Yagaloff said. "We have engaged them." 

In March of 2012, representatives from the South Windsor Ambulance Corps said that it would cost up to $700,000 to upgrade to paramedic-level care.

But at a Town Council meeting on Dec. 17, 2012, Galligan said that the town could obtain advance life support services for no additional cost. He did not elaborate how that would be done.

In Jan. 22 letter, Larry Gorman and the other members of the Board of Directors for South Windsor Ambulance Corps defended the EMS-only service, suggesting that instead of distributing a Request

For Proposal for advanced services, the town should ask for an RFP for a consultant to come in and evaluate the situation. 

Monday night members of the town council rejected this idea.

"We made a decision as a town that we want ALS," Yagaloff said. "They want to do a study."

Delnicki has directed Town Manager Matthew Galligan to request the Town Attorney to get out an RFP for services as soon as possible. 

"This is not new," Galligan said. "People are trying very hard to work with the level of care."

Other neighboring towns that already provide paramedic-level care include East Windsor, Windsor, Enfield and Manchester.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from South Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Don't we deserve better?
Susan May 23, 2013 at 06:42 am
Mr. Riley your arrogance will be your downfall as well. You elitists do not get it. Jobs may haveRead More been created in the state but folks are still losing their homes.
Matt Riley May 22, 2013 at 07:49 pm
Sorry, "Steve" and "Susan" - I have to admit that I had the same thought thatRead More "Johnny" did. This is what happens when you are unwilling to publicly standup for what you believe in - for your ideas. Suggest you show up at a TC meeting and share your thoughts - just remember that you will have to state your name and address! "Johnny" - you need to come clean too - if you want to be taken seriously.
Susan May 22, 2013 at 03:41 pm
@Johnny, I don't know who you are but I know who I am and I am not Steve's wife. It appears howeverRead More we have the same philosophy. See what Mr. McCann does not understand that his arrogance will be his downfall. Why should someone identify themselves when his comment above sounds very threatening. Everyone who comes in contact with Mr. McCann better not disagree with him to his face as he will rip you apart. Proof of that is at council meetings. Good day Johnny.
"Visionaries" of South Windsor lead by McCann and Daugherty hard at work...
Steve Phillips May 18, 2013 at 08:55 am
Mr. McCann arrogantly conducts himself on the Town Council and here as if he is above criticism,Read More forgetting (or simply not caring) about the privilege and responsibility serving elected office holds. A privilege and responsibility granted by the very same constituents McCann insults with comments above. Lacking empathy and humility are never traits respected leaders aspire, and sadly what McCann has disrespectfully expressed here.
Susan May 17, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Totally agree with you Mr. Sullivan. There are some who cannot use their real name or only a firstRead More name at fear of being attacked. Being a politician Mr. McCann has no problem speaking out. If you disagree with him you get ripped apart. I have witnessed it first hand by watching the council meetings on TV.
Michael Sullivan May 17, 2013 at 04:00 pm
Some folks choose not to use their real or full names on public bulletin boards and blogs…Read More Welcome to the 21st century Mr. McCann! Indeed the terms of use for Patch say quite clearly: "We encourage, but do not require, that the user name you provide be your real name." Mr. McCann you have chosen to be a public figure and politician. Others who may only wish to participate anonymously on blogs and postings such as these are not required to participate at whatever _you_ may deem to be an acceptable level.
Larry Torff May 17, 2013 at 10:29 pm
If tax, spend, borrow and figure out how to pay for it later is the way to budget for the future,Read More I'll take the old guard, thank you.
Michael Sullivan May 16, 2013 at 01:08 pm
I believe there's a misprint - the title should have been "BORROWING for the future"?