.
Feedback

South Windsor Public Works Employees Honored by Town Officials for Putting Out Fire

Mark Hilton and Tim Cronin receive the Town Coin and have a proclamation read on their behalf.

South Windsor town officials last week recognized two quick-witted public works employees for extinguishing a trash can fire that could have spread to a Birch Hill Drive home.

Maintainers Mark Hilton and Tim Cronin were driving by the residence at 21 Birch Hill Drive on the afternoon of Jan. 17 when they noticed a trash can that was on fire. The trash can was leaning up against the side of the home, and easily could have spread beyond just burning the side of the house.


A 22-year-old woman was home at the time of the incident, but she was not aware of the fire until firefighters arrived. The fire started as a result of the improper disposal of ashes from a wood stove into a plastic container.

At the Town Council meeting on Jan. 22, Mayor Tom Delnicki presented Hilton and Cronin each with the Town Coin and read a proclamation thanking them for their heroics.

“I think we have to make these guys honorary volunteer firefighters,” Delnicki quipped to South Windsor Volunteer Fire Department Chief Kevin Cooney. “Quick thinking, being in the right place at the right time.”

Cooney, for his part, expressed his gratitude for Hilton’s and Cronin’s actions.

“I don’t want to think about what would have happened, because the potential was certainly there [for a tragedy]” he said. “There was a severe case that took place in Stamford not too long ago where we lost an entire family.”

Cooney said that it was pure good fortune that Hilton and Cronin were driving by in a residential neighborhood during a time of the day when most people are at work.

“I appreciate their efforts and I thank them on behalf of the fire department,” Cooney said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from South Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin McCann:  Don't we deserve better?
Hank Cullinane May 23, 2013 at 04:09 pm
entrenched politician, Nixonian strategy, Petulant bait and switch, profligate spending, OrwellianRead More "new approach", but don't worry Kevin it is just a perceived persecutor.
Kevin McCann May 23, 2013 at 03:17 pm
Mike, thanks for using your real name, and for trying to have a repsectful discourse. I wish moreRead More would do so. I disagree with you, but we can agree to disagree. I do not berate people's ideas, and I have never threatened anyone. My only criticism has been of the tactic of taking pot shots from the dark. I believe that "Steve Phillips" is an elected official, which makes his rants that much more objectionable by using a pseudonym. I don't mind criticism. What I do mind is shadowy mud slinging that makes it so difficult for either party to recruit good people to run for office. There are a lot of good people who see the gratuitous insults and maligning, and say that they do not want to subject themselves to that nonsense. Using real names raises the level of discourse and allows for a real exchange of ideas.
Michael Sullivan May 23, 2013 at 01:01 pm
More red-herring here! First Mr. McCann and now Mr. Riley... Really, gentlemen? You do yourselvesRead More a disservice. How can you expect to be taken seriously as town leaders if you would continue to persist in berating folks on public blogs about their user names?!? It is undignified. Quite plainly you are bullying here – I question your judgment.
"Visionaries" of South Windsor lead by McCann and Daugherty hard at work...
Steve Phillips May 18, 2013 at 08:55 am
Mr. McCann arrogantly conducts himself on the Town Council and here as if he is above criticism,Read More forgetting (or simply not caring) about the privilege and responsibility serving elected office holds. A privilege and responsibility granted by the very same constituents McCann insults with comments above. Lacking empathy and humility are never traits respected leaders aspire, and sadly what McCann has disrespectfully expressed here.
Susan May 17, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Totally agree with you Mr. Sullivan. There are some who cannot use their real name or only a firstRead More name at fear of being attacked. Being a politician Mr. McCann has no problem speaking out. If you disagree with him you get ripped apart. I have witnessed it first hand by watching the council meetings on TV.
Michael Sullivan May 17, 2013 at 04:00 pm
Some folks choose not to use their real or full names on public bulletin boards and blogs…Read More Welcome to the 21st century Mr. McCann! Indeed the terms of use for Patch say quite clearly: "We encourage, but do not require, that the user name you provide be your real name." Mr. McCann you have chosen to be a public figure and politician. Others who may only wish to participate anonymously on blogs and postings such as these are not required to participate at whatever _you_ may deem to be an acceptable level.
Kevin McCann May 23, 2013 at 03:31 pm
Larry, I don't like borrowing any more than you do. The fact of the matter is that the Town hasRead More ignored so many pressing issues for so long, the only realistic way to get back on track is to do a modest amount of borrowing, unless you want to see tax increases of 10% or more, instead of the average hike of 4.36% in the budget that we passed last week. We have a rare opportunity to address some of those needs at historic low interest rates. It is not a matter of borrowing now and figuring out how to pay for it later. It is going ahead with projects for the future of our Town while it is affordable to do so.
Larry Torff May 17, 2013 at 10:29 pm
If tax, spend, borrow and figure out how to pay for it later is the way to budget for the future,Read More I'll take the old guard, thank you.
Michael Sullivan May 16, 2013 at 01:08 pm
I believe there's a misprint - the title should have been "BORROWING for the future"?