.
Feedback

[Updated Nov. 15 7:30 p.m.] South Windsor Rink/Rec/Pool Proposal Could Cost Thousands More than Estimated

Town attorney says that the 63-20 corporation, as an agent of the town, would "probably" be required to pay prevailing wages.

The proposed ice rink/recreation center/pool project that has been proposed for the Promenade Shops at Evergreen Walk could cost up to at least $600,000 more than its initial $10.5 million price tag.

Indeed, according to Town Attorney Dwight Johnson in a Nov. 8 letter to the Town Council, the project would "probably" require the payment of prevailing wages to construction workers, which could drive up the labor costs of construction by 20 to 30 percent.

In an interview on Nov. 15, Town Councilor Kevin McCann said that labor costs would be about 30 percent of the cost of the project, and the prevailing wage would add about 20 percent the labor. That would mean about 6 percent - or roughly $600,000 - added to the project. The labor cost could be higher by a couple hundred thousand dollars more, depending on the calculations of the prevailing wages.

Johnson's comments were in response to several questions submitted to him by Mayor Tom Delnicki and Town Councilor Kevin McCann concerning the legalities of the project, which would be constructed near the Old Navy at the lifestyle mall.

Among the highlights of the other responses provided by Johnson are the following:

  • The town charter permits the use of a 63-20 corporation to construct the project, in Johnson’s opinion, without the need for a referendum for the town to enter into a lease with that corporation.
  • A simple majority - five town councilors out of the nine - would be needed to approve the project as proposed, according to Johnson. “Six votes is required to approve an expenditure of more the $25,000 if the expenditure is not provided for in the annual budget,” Johnson wrote. “In this case, a vote of five members would be sufficient provided that the Town is not expending its own money on the project.  If the Town were to enter into a lease for all or a portion of the use of the facility, the annual appropriation of the lease payments would be included in the annual budget.  Expenditures by a properly formed 63-20 corporation would not be considered an expenditure by the Town for these purposes.”
  • It does not appear that competitive bidding is necessary for the project because the 63-20 corporation would be handling construction.
  • Johnson estimates the cost for the town to defend against a legal challenge to the project to run between $25,000 to $100,000, depending on how far in the process a lawsuit went. The $100,000 figure is an estimate in the unlikely event that the matter went to trial.

Efforts to reach Delnicki for comment were unsuccessful.

The proposal calls for the creation of a 63-20 not-for-profit corporation, which would obtain federal tax-free bonds to construct the following:

  • a 35,000 square-foot community center for youths that will have classrooms and an aquatic center comprising an eight-lane pool, therapy pool and diving pools.
  • Two - one indoor, one outdoor - ice skating rinks; the indoor rink alone will be 38,000 square feet and will be under the same roof as the Community Center, while the outdoor rink would be about 22,000 square feet.
  • An extensive multi-use trail and bike path system that would connect the Promenade Shops at Evergreen Walk with the Town Center. The new paths would provide safe connections for pedestrians and cyclists.

The corporation would then lease the use of the rinks, pool and recreation center to the town, according to the plan.

The project, brought before the Town Council last month, has generated some controversy and more than a little conversation in South Windsor.

Some residents have said that the project would be a much-needed asset that would alleviate space problems at the Charles N. Enes Community Center, provide a source of recreation in town and give the Promenade Shops at Evergreen Walk a shot in the arm in a challenging economy. Members of the biking and high school swimming and diving community have also expressed their support for the project.

more than the projected $600,000 annual lease payment that was submitted to the Town Council. Furthermore, others have said that there is no need to build a new ice hockey rink when one already exists in the town - South Windsor Arena.

[Correction: the original piece stated that prevailing wage could drive up the cost of the project by several million dollars. South Windsor Patch regrets the error.]

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from South Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin McCann:  Don't we deserve better?
Hank Cullinane May 23, 2013 at 04:09 pm
entrenched politician, Nixonian strategy, Petulant bait and switch, profligate spending, OrwellianRead More "new approach", but don't worry Kevin it is just a perceived persecutor.
Kevin McCann May 23, 2013 at 03:17 pm
Mike, thanks for using your real name, and for trying to have a repsectful discourse. I wish moreRead More would do so. I disagree with you, but we can agree to disagree. I do not berate people's ideas, and I have never threatened anyone. My only criticism has been of the tactic of taking pot shots from the dark. I believe that "Steve Phillips" is an elected official, which makes his rants that much more objectionable by using a pseudonym. I don't mind criticism. What I do mind is shadowy mud slinging that makes it so difficult for either party to recruit good people to run for office. There are a lot of good people who see the gratuitous insults and maligning, and say that they do not want to subject themselves to that nonsense. Using real names raises the level of discourse and allows for a real exchange of ideas.
Michael Sullivan May 23, 2013 at 01:01 pm
More red-herring here! First Mr. McCann and now Mr. Riley... Really, gentlemen? You do yourselvesRead More a disservice. How can you expect to be taken seriously as town leaders if you would continue to persist in berating folks on public blogs about their user names?!? It is undignified. Quite plainly you are bullying here – I question your judgment.
"Visionaries" of South Windsor lead by McCann and Daugherty hard at work...
Steve Phillips May 18, 2013 at 08:55 am
Mr. McCann arrogantly conducts himself on the Town Council and here as if he is above criticism,Read More forgetting (or simply not caring) about the privilege and responsibility serving elected office holds. A privilege and responsibility granted by the very same constituents McCann insults with comments above. Lacking empathy and humility are never traits respected leaders aspire, and sadly what McCann has disrespectfully expressed here.
Susan May 17, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Totally agree with you Mr. Sullivan. There are some who cannot use their real name or only a firstRead More name at fear of being attacked. Being a politician Mr. McCann has no problem speaking out. If you disagree with him you get ripped apart. I have witnessed it first hand by watching the council meetings on TV.
Michael Sullivan May 17, 2013 at 04:00 pm
Some folks choose not to use their real or full names on public bulletin boards and blogs…Read More Welcome to the 21st century Mr. McCann! Indeed the terms of use for Patch say quite clearly: "We encourage, but do not require, that the user name you provide be your real name." Mr. McCann you have chosen to be a public figure and politician. Others who may only wish to participate anonymously on blogs and postings such as these are not required to participate at whatever _you_ may deem to be an acceptable level.