.
Feedback

South Windsor Town Council Majority Against Banning Tobacco Sales in Pharmacies

Many councilors said the proposal was too much of an overreach and discounted personal responsibility.

South Windsor resident Kathy Daugherty remembers the exact day she quit her long-time smoking habit.

“Thirteen years, 3 months and 28 days ago, but who’s counting,” she remarked during the Town Council’s regular meeting on Monday.

Still, despite giving up her unhealthy habit in favor of walking and running, Daugherty vehemently opposed a possible ordinance that would ban South Windsor pharmacies - more specifically, just CVS and Target, because they are the only pharmacies in town, though only CVS was discussed - from selling tobacco products.


“If you as a Town Council target one business selling an item that causes harm because there is a MinuteClinic on the premises…why stop there?” asked Daugherty, noting that obesity and diabetes have reached epidemic proportions in the U.S. “Why not remove chips or candy or sugary drinks from the store?”

Town Councilor Dr. Saud Anwar first brought up the item at a meeting in July, but Tuesday was the first time the council fully addressed it as a discussion item.

For Anwar, the issue was a matter of public health and corporate responsibility.

During a PowerPoint presentation, Anwar noted that 1 in 5 deaths in the U.S. were attributable to tobacco use and that smoking was the leading cause of preventable death. He also offered eight counterarguments to claims like South Windsor should also ban Slurpees and Big Gulps, two popular sugary drink items offered by the chain 7-Eleven.

Anwar noted that there was no acceptable level of ingesting a cigarette, though there are acceptable levels of consuming candy bars, sodas and alcohol.

What’s more, pharmacies - particularly ones with clinics like CVS - are part of the health care industry, Anwar said, and, therefore, bears a responsibility to keep from selling inherently dangerous, harmful products.

“A pharmacy is a place you should go to get better, not get cancer,” Anwar said during his presentation. “It is physically wrong to sell cigarettes in the same place. … It is not me versus you or a political issue

But the Republican majority on the Town Council and members of the public who weighed in on the discussion said that the council either should not: 1. infringe on one’s personal responsibility from refraining from or choosing to use tobacco; 2. single out CVS from engaging in legally sanction commercial trade; or 3. overreach in its responsibilities as a local governing body.

Deputy Mayor Gary Bazzano said that while he was against smoking, he would be more likely to support a measure that would ban all businesses - not just pharmacies - from selling tobacco products.

“If you just say to CVS, ‘You can’t sell cigarettes,’ I don’t think that solves the problem,” he said.

Councilor Kevin McCann said that the Town Council would overextend its authority by imposing such a ban.

“What we’re talking about is the use of power by the Town Council,” McCann said invoking the term “Big Brother.” “Do we say we know what is best for everyone and what they can and can’t do?"

“Democracy isn’t two wolves getting together with a sheep and deciding what to have for dinner. Having power doesn’t mean we have the right to do it,” he said.

Councilor Cindy Beaulieu agreed that she was uncomfortable with what the town charter allowed the council to do as well as whether there was a disconnect between Anwar’s presentation and CVS.

Mayor Tom Delnicki concluded by stating that he did not want to single out CVS - which he characterized as a convenience store that happened to have a pharmacy - and have it lead down a slippery slope of having to ban Halloween candy, chips and sugary drinks.

“I don’t want to put a target on [CVS’] back,” he said.

But Anwar responded that he was not singling out CVS; it just happens to be the only pharmacy in town.

“If we had 20 pharmacies in town, I would be proposing banning tobacco sales in 20 pharmacies,” he said.

Anwar also was not without his supporters.

Councilor Keith Yagaloff said that he knew of several communities in Massachusetts that banned the sales of tobacco products from pharmacies, including Boston and Wellesley.

Yagaloff said that the council had an obligation to promote the general health, welfare and safety of its residents, and that included banning tobacco products from pharmacies.

He noted that other methods of selling cigarettes, including vending machines, had been banned from places where children were, or were likely to be, present.

“We need to take incremental steps forward,” Yagaloff said.

The discussion sometimes turned tense, highlighted when Councilor Cary Prague stood up and left the podium and sat in the public seats when Yagaloff said that Prague admitted that he was being “partisan” by not backing Anwar’s proposal.

Still, at the end of the two-hour discussion, it was clear that Anwar’s proposal was not backed by a majority on the council.

Several councilors suggested that Anwar take up a boycott or write letters to CVS’ parent company about changing its policies. Daugherty said that she would work with Anwar to form educational policies to prevent children from taking up smoking to begin with.

"I'm here because I want you as a Town Council to do your job," Daugherty said. "Fix the leaking elementary school roofs...that's an issue of public health."

But Anwar remained undaunted, even if he was in the clear minority, stating that he "expected more" from CVS, the town, the community and the people.

"It's not a matter of personal responsibility," he said. "A child doesn't know any better. I recognize that I am in the minority, but I stand by what I believe in."

Correction: The article originally stated that CVS is the only business in South Windsor with a pharmacy. Target also has a pharmacy. South Windsor Patch regrets the error.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from South Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
"Visionaries" of South Windsor lead by McCann and Daugherty hard at work...
Steve Phillips May 18, 2013 at 08:55 am
Mr. McCann arrogantly conducts himself on the Town Council and here as if he is above criticism,Read More forgetting (or simply not caring) about the privilege and responsibility serving elected office holds. A privilege and responsibility granted by the very same constituents McCann insults with comments above. Lacking empathy and humility are never traits respected leaders aspire, and sadly what McCann has disrespectfully expressed here.
Susan May 17, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Totally agree with you Mr. Sullivan. There are some who cannot use their real name or only a firstRead More name at fear of being attacked. Being a politician Mr. McCann has no problem speaking out. If you disagree with him you get ripped apart. I have witnessed it first hand by watching the council meetings on TV.
Michael Sullivan May 17, 2013 at 04:00 pm
Some folks choose not to use their real or full names on public bulletin boards and blogs…Read More Welcome to the 21st century Mr. McCann! Indeed the terms of use for Patch say quite clearly: "We encourage, but do not require, that the user name you provide be your real name." Mr. McCann you have chosen to be a public figure and politician. Others who may only wish to participate anonymously on blogs and postings such as these are not required to participate at whatever _you_ may deem to be an acceptable level.
Larry Torff May 17, 2013 at 10:29 pm
If tax, spend, borrow and figure out how to pay for it later is the way to budget for the future,Read More I'll take the old guard, thank you.
Michael Sullivan May 16, 2013 at 01:08 pm
I believe there's a misprint - the title should have been "BORROWING for the future"?
keith yagaloff May 14, 2013 at 06:07 pm
Darren, I've said many times that a small scale fields project could have been approved as early asRead More last summer. There are opportunities to fund the project from within the existing budget. Tom and I both offered to use money from the contingency account to get the planning studies completed. The hockey rink proponents never brought any actual data to the council. The town manager and our financial consultant gathered financial data and notified the council that the project was not viable. A political fight over funding the pension using 7.75% versus 8% as the discount rate was unnecessary. The pension was funded in accordance with the ARC, as town councils have done virtually every year since the pension was in place. Fluctuations due to market conditions far exceed the differences in proposed funding. We have had positive town audits with no indication that the town's financial rating is at risk. The town is financially very healthy.
Darren DeMartino May 14, 2013 at 05:13 pm
Keith I think Buford makes a lot of sense. The large majority of this tax increase was caused by theRead More past council members for years more worried about getting reelected than the current council. This increase was fueled by years of cutting to the bone, pushing things off when they should have been dealt with in a timely fashion. Mayor Delnicki (not Delnickie) who you have praised so much over the past day or so himself warned numerous times that this increase was coming. He stated numerous times on camera and in the press that there would be a day of reckoning in the future due to the cuts we had made over the years and now that it is here no one wants to face it. Now that you and Tom are on the same side it is interesting how much your perspective has changed? It is interesting in your article that you reference how certain councilors have embrace the borrow and spend mentality yet you and your cohorts voted against amendments to fund the pension based upon a more realistic 7.75% discount rate in comparison to 8% as well as an amendment that would have prevented us from taking $800,000 out of found account(savings account) which could negatively impact our future ratings. In regards to the fields you have stated you are in favor of them so if so why not take advantage of low construction costs and historically low interest rates to invest in something that will make our town a more desirable place to live? In regards to the hockey rink why is it that we never even got the facts about what the financial impact would be to the town. We both know it was because somehow egos got in the way of exploring what would be best for our town. Our town is a great place to live but if we continue down this past that wont be the case in a very short time.
keith yagaloff May 14, 2013 at 03:22 pm
Dear Buford, thank you for your comments. You more than adequately describe your views when youRead More write "Unfortunately for you, you live in a 1%er town in a 1%er state." All that my wife and I possess was earned through honest hard work and we take no shame in that. Never once, however, did it cross my mind to use taxpayer money to fund projects for myself and my friends. I feel sorry for other hard working people living in South Windsor who find their tax dollars have been co-opted by elected officials who think they are running Apple or Walmart.
Philip E. Koboski May 15, 2013 at 12:41 pm
Lemiel Odell's comments regarding the sports teams at the high school are both uninformed and unfairRead More to the student athletes on those teams. It's always best to know what you are talking about before posting something online to show that you really don't. First, the swim team. That group of student athletes completed while fully funding themselves for at least two years. Since its inception, there has been no issues with filling roster spots. As for the hockey team, you just need to read the scores in the sports page to see that we are one of the very few schools in the area that is not a "combined team". Other teams in our conference are made up of athletes from two or three schools. The South Windsor High School ice hockey team continues to fill it's roster with students from town. Obviously, there is an interest. While Mr. Odell may support the students option to play, he shoudl at least respect it. His comments about the turf field would be correct if his letter was written in 1974, when Astro-turf was still in use. The new turf fields are far more player-friendly and the last time I heard any complaint about turf-toe was from Fran Tarkenton and his days in Minnesota. The cushion under the turf is now designed to minimize the risk of concussions, and it takes just a small bit of research to see that the major cause of concussions is head-to-head contact. Yes, I said it, HEAD-TO-HEAD CONTACT. While I agree that the town shoudl not have funded a new business in town at the expense of an existing business, it is no secret that South WIndsor needs a new ice arena to replace the one we have now. I have played in that arena, and into the mid-1990's, there was still chicken wire above the boards, not plexi-glass. There was not a player on any team that would ever venture to shower in those locker rooms. They were disgusting, and as a South Windsor resident, I am embarrassed to have players from other towns go into them. Knowing that the 63-20 financing would not be used to finance a new rink in town, Councilor Bazzano still led the effort to educate the citizens in how this financing could work to help with other projects in the town. Sadly, his efforts were undercut by Mayor Delnicki in that meeting with him pushing it towards the incorrect thought that this would go directly to build a new rec center in town. This was a great opportunity to help the folks of South WIndsor understand how this could come into play for other improvements in town, and it was torpedoed byt he mayor and another Councilor who attacked one of the attorneys as he answered questions from the Town Council. That exchange let to Councilor Snyder to call for a point of order in the meeting and both Councilor Bazzano and Councilor McCann to say that the attack was enough. That was an opportunity that was lost, and that is truly a shame.
Darren DeMartino May 13, 2013 at 03:45 pm
The blog above references an $10,000,000 unaffordable hockey rink and that Mayor Delnicki should beRead More praised. Why would we praise him? He did everything he could to squash this project before we even got to see the finances of the project and whether or not it would have been a benefit to South Windsor. He continually references how he is a voice for the taxpayer. I take issue with that statement as there are a number of taxpayers myself included who feel that we need to invest in our town to protect our property values, not defer all expenses for as long as we can. Has he ever met a budget year that he didn't say was going to be terrible? How is borrowing from the fund balance to pay for current expenses a benefit to our town? How is deferring necessary pension contributions going to benefit us, young families who have just moved to town, or more importantly our children that would like to stay in this town when they get older?
Dana May 13, 2013 at 06:31 am
We need council to run the the town more like a business. If you do not invest in that business youRead More go out of business.
South Windsor Taxpayers:  Beware the Drunken Sailor!
Steve Phillips May 17, 2013 at 10:35 am
Yes, certainly Hank.
Hank Cullinane May 17, 2013 at 07:46 am
so you are saying Soccer mom's and Softball dad's are entrenched special interest groups?
Steve Phillips May 16, 2013 at 05:23 pm
Well Hank, I must say, there does not seem to be a single athletic group that does not send Bazzano,Read More McCann et al hearts aflutter. The result? Million dollar Boondoggles like an ice rink, turf fields and an unnecessary Athletic Complex.