.
Feedback

South Windsor Town Council Declines to Add Sixth Capital Improvements Referendum Question

Proposal calling for $1.5 million expansion to the Charles N. Enes Community Center was defeated by a 5-3 vote.

The South Windsor Town Council Thursday evening declined to add to the November ballot a sixth capital improvements referendum question that, if approved by voters, would have expanded the Charles N. Enes Community Center.

The proposed measure, which was defeated by a 5-3 vote, called for a $1.5 million expansion of up to 10,000 square feet to the community center, which currently houses both the senior center, the family and youth services department and the parks and recreation department.

At a regular meeting Tuesday, the council to voters in November.

No one at the council’s emergency meeting Thursday claimed that there wasn’t a need for space at the community center, which oftentimes sees multiple agencies competing for rooms for programming and other services.

Mayor Tom Delnicki said that he did not support the proposed community center expansion because the project had not been properly vetted like those contained in the five approved questions that will appear on the November ballot.

“I too want to see something done to the community center,” he said. “But I want to see something successful done. We have to do it right. … In this one, we don’t know what we’re getting. We don’t know what $1.5 million will buy us.”

Indeed, the $1.5 million figure was derived from what a 10,000-foot expansion would cost the town at $150 per square foot, something that Town Manager Matt Galligan said was not guaranteed once the project was put out to bid.

Galligan said that the 10,000-square foot estimate was at the high-end, and that the town could wind up with something like a 6,000 to 8,000-square foot expansion.

In addition, Delnicki said that he was concerned that, if the measure failed in November, voters would simply dismiss proposed work on the community center as a matter of course; a $3 million referendum to expand the senior center portion of the community center failed to pass in 2010.

“How many times are we going to bring it up before people tune it out?” Delnicki asked. “That’s the last thing I want to see.”

But two of the measure’s supporters - Councilors Keith Yagaloff and Ed Havens - said that the expansion should be left to the voters despite Delnicki’s concerns.

“My personal feeling is five questions is too many,” Havens said. “[But] the public is a lot smarter than we are. … It’s not our decision, it’s their decision and I’m going to leave it to them.”

Yagaloff, one of three members of the minority Democratic party on the council, said that the council should approve the measure, as Democrats generally supported other capital improvements that they otherwise may have disagreed with to show the public there was a united front with the Republican majority on the projects.

“I think it’s important to address all the needs of the community in this referendum cycle,” Yagaloff said.

But Delnicki said that the best way to move forward was to refer the matter to the South Windsor public building committee to see what is in the town’s best interests with the community center’s expansion.

In the end, Yagaloff and Havens were joined by Councilor Jan Snyder as the only three who supported the measure. Councilor Dr. Saud Anwar, who initially proposed the community center expansion at the council’s regular meeting on Tuesday as an add-on to the town’s renovation referendum question before calling for an emergency meeting, was not present. Delinicki was joined by Cary Prague, Deputy Mayor Gary Bazzano, Cindy Beaulieu and Kevin McCann in voting against the proposal.

Still, after the meeting, Delnicki said that he would call for a council subcommittee comprising one Democrat (Delnicki specifically mentioned Anwar) and one Republican to work with the public building committee to see what $1.5 million would accomplish in expanding the community center.

While that represents some progress, the move effectively means that any potential renovation to the community center will have to wait at least one more budget cycle.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from South Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kevin McCann:  Don't we deserve better?
Hank Cullinane May 23, 2013 at 04:09 pm
entrenched politician, Nixonian strategy, Petulant bait and switch, profligate spending, OrwellianRead More "new approach", but don't worry Kevin it is just a perceived persecutor.
Kevin McCann May 23, 2013 at 03:17 pm
Mike, thanks for using your real name, and for trying to have a repsectful discourse. I wish moreRead More would do so. I disagree with you, but we can agree to disagree. I do not berate people's ideas, and I have never threatened anyone. My only criticism has been of the tactic of taking pot shots from the dark. I believe that "Steve Phillips" is an elected official, which makes his rants that much more objectionable by using a pseudonym. I don't mind criticism. What I do mind is shadowy mud slinging that makes it so difficult for either party to recruit good people to run for office. There are a lot of good people who see the gratuitous insults and maligning, and say that they do not want to subject themselves to that nonsense. Using real names raises the level of discourse and allows for a real exchange of ideas.
Michael Sullivan May 23, 2013 at 01:01 pm
More red-herring here! First Mr. McCann and now Mr. Riley... Really, gentlemen? You do yourselvesRead More a disservice. How can you expect to be taken seriously as town leaders if you would continue to persist in berating folks on public blogs about their user names?!? It is undignified. Quite plainly you are bullying here – I question your judgment.
"Visionaries" of South Windsor lead by McCann and Daugherty hard at work...
Steve Phillips May 18, 2013 at 08:55 am
Mr. McCann arrogantly conducts himself on the Town Council and here as if he is above criticism,Read More forgetting (or simply not caring) about the privilege and responsibility serving elected office holds. A privilege and responsibility granted by the very same constituents McCann insults with comments above. Lacking empathy and humility are never traits respected leaders aspire, and sadly what McCann has disrespectfully expressed here.
Susan May 17, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Totally agree with you Mr. Sullivan. There are some who cannot use their real name or only a firstRead More name at fear of being attacked. Being a politician Mr. McCann has no problem speaking out. If you disagree with him you get ripped apart. I have witnessed it first hand by watching the council meetings on TV.
Michael Sullivan May 17, 2013 at 04:00 pm
Some folks choose not to use their real or full names on public bulletin boards and blogs…Read More Welcome to the 21st century Mr. McCann! Indeed the terms of use for Patch say quite clearly: "We encourage, but do not require, that the user name you provide be your real name." Mr. McCann you have chosen to be a public figure and politician. Others who may only wish to participate anonymously on blogs and postings such as these are not required to participate at whatever _you_ may deem to be an acceptable level.