.
Feedback

Council to Survey Residents on Big-Ticket Items

Town Council is mulling a November referendum concerning a number of big-ticket capital improvements projects.

The South Windsor Town Council on Monday continued its discussion of a possible November capital improvements projects referendum by forming a bipartisan subcommittee that will prepare questions to survey residents as to what projects they deem most necessary.

The survey, proposed by Councilor Cary Prague, essentially will take the temperature of 1,500 residents concerning the approximately $12 million capital improvements projects that were brought before the council earlier this month.


Those projects include, among other things, the following:

  • $2 million for IT upgrades for the town;
  • $1.7 million in town buildings upgrades;
  • $3.3 million in school buildings upgrades, including roof replacements at the high school and Pleasant Valley School;
  • $3 million in road re-paving and repairs;
  • $650,000 to re-pave the high school parking lot; and
  • $1.35 million for IT upgrades in the schools.

Prague said that the survey would give the council a better idea of what projects the public would support when it comes time to vote in November.

“A survey should be conducted in order to give the Town Council some insight as to the feeling today of the voters as to various proposed referendum items,” Prague said. “The survey will provide valuable feedback without having to waste resources in preparing a referendum and increase the likelihood of passage through awareness not allowed through marketing of a referendum and the spending of public funds after the passage of a resolution authorizing the referendum.”

Most of the councilors supported the survey, though some were more enthusiastic about it than others.

Councilor Keith Yagaloff said that he supported a scaled-back survey that asks voters how they prioritize perhaps four or five projects, not a slew of them, in hopes of communicating to the public that the Town Council was not going on “a spending spree.”

At one point, the conversation turned to the proposed $3 million athletics fields improvement project, which Councilor Saud Anwar said should be broken out and put to voters separately and not “piggybacked” on a referendum question that includes something “critical” like road repairs.

“If the fields are critical, let them stand on their own,” he said.

Others said that, while they were not prepared to discuss specific projects at that time and also questioned the value of a survey, they would still back one going to voters.

“If we want to send a survey out, I’ll support it, but I don’t know what it will accomplish,” Councilor Edward Havens said.

Councilor Cindy Beaulieu said that she thought the survey was fine, provided that it was completed in a timely manner.

“I like the idea of a survey; it makes sense,” she said, provided that the council moves “quickly” and she learns more of the scope.”

Beaulieu also said that, while it wasn’t time to discuss specific projects, the athletics fields situation still needed to be addressed.

In the end, Mayor Tom Delnicki, Deputy Mayor Gary Bazzano, Anwar and Havens were all appointed to the subcommittee, which will report back to the Town Council with its questions for the survey at the next regular meeting on July 30.

In other business, the Town Council unanimously approved sending an amended demolition delay ordinance to a public hearing scheduled for Sept. 4.

During public comment, six residents all spoke in favor of the athletics fields capital improvements, which include installation of synthetic turf at the South Windsor High School stadium; construction of one new synthetic field, two new natural-turf fields and a 188-space parking lot on 11 acres of land at Nevers Park; the 90 degree realignment of the Ayers Road softball field; and the installation of lights at a baseball field at Nevers Park.

Dana Weber of the town’s girls lacrosse association and Bob Goldman of the South Windsor Soccer League spoke of how their respective sports compete with one another for fields.

The next Town Council meeting is scheduled for July 30.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from South Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Gail Cloutier June 15, 2013 at 04:20 pm
One Mr. Yagaloff I was not rude to anyone else I was talking about you and was not in no mean rudeRead More to you. If you take it that way then so be it. Do I wish to talk to you no, cause it won't do any good. Everyone has given their own comment and the damage is done and now it's time for eveyone to learn from it and move on.
keith yagaloff June 15, 2013 at 05:11 pm
Gail, I agree that its time for everyone to learn from this incident. It is a teachable moment asRead More well. Both the Boy Scout and Cub Scout oaths can be the source of guidance in this instance. Scouting asks its youth to obey the rules of the pack and the law. Here is a direct quote "DUTY TO GOD AND COUNTRY: Your family and religious leaders teach you to know and serve God. By following these teachings, you do your duty to God. Men and women of the past worked to make America great, and many gave their lives for their country. By being a good family member and a good citizen, by working for your country's good and obeying its laws, you do your duty to your country. Obeying the Scout Law means living by its 12 points." The fundraising committee made a mistake. Choosing to adopt the mean spirited rhetoric of the Chair of the Republican Town Committee is not what these children expect or deserve. The BSA leadership stepped up and are leading by example. I met my responsibility as a community leader. Can you say the same?
Gail Cloutier June 15, 2013 at 07:11 pm
If you feel the same as me as everyone needs to stop and move on. I can clearly see you can't, causeRead More of the long letter above. I was always told by my wonderful parents to mind your own busy and not someone else. God Bless to us all and Good Bye.............
Rick Usifer June 11, 2013 at 06:38 pm
I agree that these statements seem inappropriate. I wasn't at the meeting and didn't see it, butRead More from this account an apology is certainly in order. I'm surprised that Dr. Anwar, a thoughtful and reasonable man, would say that to someone who absolutely did the right thing. One of South Windsor's biggest attributes is that is NOT a "large" town. That would have cost us revenue in other areas such as housing. I'm very disappointed in both men.
Dana June 12, 2013 at 09:22 am
It seems to me that Dr. Anwar and Mr. Delnicki do not like the truth and would rather the town liveRead More a lie than to let the public know reality. Hopefully the public sees this and votes for those who tell the truth.
Hank Cullinane June 12, 2013 at 03:45 pm
While I do think Deputy Mayor Bazzano said "funny" I think his opponents are trying toRead More take his statement out of context. I believe he said it was funny that the magazine has us in large towns. That is funny as is strange not it ha ha. Is he going to get an apology from Council Anwar I doubt it. As to losing business, I hope any business planning on coming to South Windsor is not doing it solely on a Hartford Magazine article. Now we can also publicize the integrity of our town officials who wanted the information to be correct.
Kevin McCann:  Don't we deserve better?
Darren DeMartino June 7, 2013 at 03:51 pm
Mike, While I too would like to address thew schools we cant change the fact that are town isRead More slipping in comparison to other towns around us. do you still feel the same way that the ratings didnt come at a convenient time? The truth is we need to invest in in our town to maintain the quality of life people are looking for today. If we dont do it we will not remain an attractive place to live. There are a number of towns in our area that have faced these choices. Some of those town have decided to look to the future and others have fallen behind, not very surprisingly some of our surrounding towns have fared much better over the past 15-20 years than others. The key questions is what does the town of South Windsor want to be? I want it to maintain the quality of life it had since I was a small child. That means growing and investing not letting others pass us by because people are short sighted. I think we need too challenge our town council to look at the towns around us and figure out how they do so much more yet our taxes aren't much different that ours. We pay a lot for very little in comparison to other towns in our area. We get trash and leaf pickup, not that big of a deal cost wise yet we dont get new schools, rec center, senior center, or neccessary fields. We should all want more for our tax dollar!
Michael Sullivan June 12, 2013 at 01:19 pm
Mr. DeMartino - I will stand by what I've said earlier, even after Mr. Bazzano corrected SouthRead More Windsor's rankings in Hartford Magazine. Yes I think this is (still!) good news and as such always welcome and convenient. My earlier comment was that these favorable rankings come at a rather inconvenient time for THOSE WHO PREFER to propagandize and insist that our salvation will come only in the form of more athletic fields and further that we must borrow more money to build them! These revised rankings don’t change anything in my opinion (with the exception of the crime statistic – that’s alarming if not an error!) and meanwhile the TC politics and propagandizing over our “status” is deplorable. I maintain these rankings STILL represent great news for South Windsor. We’re ranked no. 3 in our medium towns group (if not overall). We’re ranked no. 2 for families and schools in our medium group. And STILL we’re in top 10 overall for the county. And still that's just not good enough for some folks?!?
Michael Sullivan June 12, 2013 at 01:25 pm
WRT wanting more for our tax dollars - oh yes there we can agree! But how might we agree onRead More priorities? I don’t see the need for borrowing money NOW to build UNNECESSARY (there I said it!) athletic fields no matter which other towns are perceived to be better/worse than South Windsor by our athletics enthusiasts who might prefer to bypass public referendum to get their desires. I feel strongly that the Town has other priorities – particularly if we must borrow! You cite two prime examples in the elementary schools due to their obsolescence – and the need for taking care of our seniors for rec/community space and aged-care social services that will surely be needed with predictable demographic trends. Let’s do those before we talk about more athletic facilities.
Bert Marchael June 15, 2013 at 09:00 pm
It was Bush's fault. He let the IRS stay in business. In the words of Nancy Pelosi, this will be theRead More most transparent administration, what she failed to say out loud was, this administration looks at the constitution and the laws of our country as suggestions. They pertain to everyone else. Gangsta Chicago politics in Washington. Peace