.
Feedback

Soccer: Glastonbury Sweeps South Windsor in Boys, Girls Matches

Tomahawks defeat Bobcats by a combined 5-0 on Monday afternoon.

Monday turned out to be a forgettable day for the South Windsor High varsity soccer teams, as Glastonbury High swept both the boys and the girls matches by a combined score of 5-0.

Boys: Tomahawks 2 Bobcats 0

In the boys match played at South Windsor High, Glastonbury successfully disrupted the Bobcats’ rhythm from the outset in a physical 2-0 victory that saw the referees dole out six yellow cards - four to South Windsor, two to Glastonbury.


Evan Hassett opened the Tomahawks account in the 20th minute, tucking a cross from Dan Reich into the near right post to give Glastonbury a much-deserved 1-0 lead.

Glastonbury (4-1-1) continued to get the better of South Windsor (4-1-1), its CCC North rivals, for the bulk of the match, as Hassett, left alone with space, hit the crossbar with a shot from about 20 yards out.

The Tomahawks finally broke through and put the game away with a gorgeous goal in the 63rd minute, as Luke McNabb, just inside the box, found Evan Grenus on the right side. Instead of shooting from a dubious angle, Grenus unselfishly crossed the ball to Chris Lockwood, who was unmarked on the left side. Lockwood easily slotted home his shot to give Glastonbury a 2-0 lead, all but ending any hope of a South Windsor comeback.

The Bobcats had few chances to score, as goalkeeper Chase Conway (7 saves) and defenders Yeboa Amofa, Tyler Peterson and Brock Hassett did a great job in frustrating South Windsor’s attack.

Zachary Heckt nearly leveled the Bobcats at 1-1 on a cheeky backheel shot in the 33rd minute. Conway, however, made a nifty diving stop.

In the second half, Jeffrey Allen also had a chance to put South Windsor on the board with a one-touch that was well-executed, but was directly at Conway, who cradled the ball in his chest.

Otherwise, South Windsor was largely, and surprisingly, quiet for most of the game.

It was a performance that Bobcats head coach Dave St. Jean was clearly not pleased with.

“We didn’t play the way we were capable of playing in any way, shape or form,” St. Jean said. “We didn’t look like we were mentally ready for the challenge. We didn’t look like we were resilient. We didn’t have any composure out there.

“I thought it was an effort that was not fitting of this group of kids. … Glastonbury is the class of the division always. We had to put our best foot forward against Glastonbury and quite frankly we didn’t. … It was an extremely disappointing effort.”

St. Jean said that South Windsor - players and coaches alike - would have to start over from square one.

“We’re starting over at zero tomorrow,” he said. “This is a season-changing loss that if we don’t figure these things out now, it really doesn’t matter for the rest of the season, because the postseason is going to be short. We have to start figuring things out from an emotional standpoint but also a soccer standpoint.

“I’ll take responsibility for not preparing them today in terms of things we have gone over today. … We’ve got to do a better job, starting with the coach.”

Glastonbury head coach Mark Landers, for his part, was just happy to leave South Windsor with a victory.

“Good effort on our part; we know South Windsor is the class of this league,” Landers said. “We had to come here ready to compete and I think we did that.”

Girls: Glastonbury 3 South Windsor 0

In the girls match, Glastonbury scored early goals in both halves to defeat the Bobcats 3-0 in Glastonbury.

Maddy Lamagna (4th minute), Kristen Dragotta (43rd minute) and Maddie Riggott (60th minute) each tallied for Glastonbury, the defending state Class LL champions.

Freshman goalie Hanna Basile played well for South Windsor in the loss, making 11 saves.

It was a stunning loss for South Windsor, which entered the game with a 5-0 record, having outscored its opponents by a combined 25-2. In fairness, Glastonbury was undefeated as well, improving to 6-0 on the year with the victory. The Tomahawks have outscored their opponents by a combined 30-1 in the six games.

Bobcats head coach Ed Duclos said that the loss highlighted several things that his side needed to work on.

“We have higher expectations than that and we look forward to playing them again,” Duclos said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from South Windsor Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Don't we deserve better?
Matt Riley May 22, 2013 at 07:49 pm
Sorry, "Steve" and "Susan" - I have to admit that I had the same thought thatRead More "Johnny" did. This is what happens when you are unwilling to publicly standup for what you believe in - for your ideas. Suggest you show up at a TC meeting and share your thoughts - just remember that you will have to state your name and address! "Johnny" - you need to come clean too - if you want to be taken seriously.
Susan May 22, 2013 at 03:41 pm
@Johnny, I don't know who you are but I know who I am and I am not Steve's wife. It appears howeverRead More we have the same philosophy. See what Mr. McCann does not understand that his arrogance will be his downfall. Why should someone identify themselves when his comment above sounds very threatening. Everyone who comes in contact with Mr. McCann better not disagree with him to his face as he will rip you apart. Proof of that is at council meetings. Good day Johnny.
Philip E. Koboski May 22, 2013 at 12:44 pm
I don't believe Kevin mentioned anything about anyone owing him anything in his post.
"Visionaries" of South Windsor lead by McCann and Daugherty hard at work...
Steve Phillips May 18, 2013 at 08:55 am
Mr. McCann arrogantly conducts himself on the Town Council and here as if he is above criticism,Read More forgetting (or simply not caring) about the privilege and responsibility serving elected office holds. A privilege and responsibility granted by the very same constituents McCann insults with comments above. Lacking empathy and humility are never traits respected leaders aspire, and sadly what McCann has disrespectfully expressed here.
Susan May 17, 2013 at 06:18 pm
Totally agree with you Mr. Sullivan. There are some who cannot use their real name or only a firstRead More name at fear of being attacked. Being a politician Mr. McCann has no problem speaking out. If you disagree with him you get ripped apart. I have witnessed it first hand by watching the council meetings on TV.
Michael Sullivan May 17, 2013 at 04:00 pm
Some folks choose not to use their real or full names on public bulletin boards and blogs…Read More Welcome to the 21st century Mr. McCann! Indeed the terms of use for Patch say quite clearly: "We encourage, but do not require, that the user name you provide be your real name." Mr. McCann you have chosen to be a public figure and politician. Others who may only wish to participate anonymously on blogs and postings such as these are not required to participate at whatever _you_ may deem to be an acceptable level.
Larry Torff May 17, 2013 at 10:29 pm
If tax, spend, borrow and figure out how to pay for it later is the way to budget for the future,Read More I'll take the old guard, thank you.
Michael Sullivan May 16, 2013 at 01:08 pm
I believe there's a misprint - the title should have been "BORROWING for the future"?
keith yagaloff May 14, 2013 at 06:07 pm
Darren, I've said many times that a small scale fields project could have been approved as early asRead More last summer. There are opportunities to fund the project from within the existing budget. Tom and I both offered to use money from the contingency account to get the planning studies completed. The hockey rink proponents never brought any actual data to the council. The town manager and our financial consultant gathered financial data and notified the council that the project was not viable. A political fight over funding the pension using 7.75% versus 8% as the discount rate was unnecessary. The pension was funded in accordance with the ARC, as town councils have done virtually every year since the pension was in place. Fluctuations due to market conditions far exceed the differences in proposed funding. We have had positive town audits with no indication that the town's financial rating is at risk. The town is financially very healthy.
Darren DeMartino May 14, 2013 at 05:13 pm
Keith I think Buford makes a lot of sense. The large majority of this tax increase was caused by theRead More past council members for years more worried about getting reelected than the current council. This increase was fueled by years of cutting to the bone, pushing things off when they should have been dealt with in a timely fashion. Mayor Delnicki (not Delnickie) who you have praised so much over the past day or so himself warned numerous times that this increase was coming. He stated numerous times on camera and in the press that there would be a day of reckoning in the future due to the cuts we had made over the years and now that it is here no one wants to face it. Now that you and Tom are on the same side it is interesting how much your perspective has changed? It is interesting in your article that you reference how certain councilors have embrace the borrow and spend mentality yet you and your cohorts voted against amendments to fund the pension based upon a more realistic 7.75% discount rate in comparison to 8% as well as an amendment that would have prevented us from taking $800,000 out of found account(savings account) which could negatively impact our future ratings. In regards to the fields you have stated you are in favor of them so if so why not take advantage of low construction costs and historically low interest rates to invest in something that will make our town a more desirable place to live? In regards to the hockey rink why is it that we never even got the facts about what the financial impact would be to the town. We both know it was because somehow egos got in the way of exploring what would be best for our town. Our town is a great place to live but if we continue down this past that wont be the case in a very short time.
keith yagaloff May 14, 2013 at 03:22 pm
Dear Buford, thank you for your comments. You more than adequately describe your views when youRead More write "Unfortunately for you, you live in a 1%er town in a 1%er state." All that my wife and I possess was earned through honest hard work and we take no shame in that. Never once, however, did it cross my mind to use taxpayer money to fund projects for myself and my friends. I feel sorry for other hard working people living in South Windsor who find their tax dollars have been co-opted by elected officials who think they are running Apple or Walmart.